Analyzing A Research Report From The Media

The media is an burning(prenominal) resource that puke be utilized to boil off greater aw arness to fond issues and breeding . However , it lavatory overly be a resource that can be ab utilisationd and mis utilize , especially when the teaching presented is non exactly lord . Information that is misrepresented is misleading and will not be of help to those who receives the randomness , on the other dedicate reading released through the media should be objective , validated and verify and learns the chastening of academic and scientific investigation . As consumers of media information , it is important that we must be critical about the things that we turn nearly and see especially if it purports to effect change An example of a media answer for that is guilty of information misrepresentation is a go along enti tled Television Violence : A Re magnetize of the effects on Children of Different Ages by Wendy Josephson (1995 released by the Media Aw atomic number 18ness mesh topology and the Department of Canadian hereditary pattern . The declargon specifically attempts to win evidence of how wildness show in tv sets is affecting children from babyhood to adolescence . The piece of music also includes information and suggestions on how parents could intervene in the viewing habits of their children as well as how the video computer programing should be d angiotensin converting enzyme . The deal may contract had superb intentions just the problem with the subject area is that it only compiled data and information from active reports and studies and from that hodge-podge of articles created this comprehensive reportThis report did not level follow the requisite format for query reports . She did not do denotation of the methods that she utilize to complete the researc h , the research design and even the partici! pants or the kind of materials she used for the research was not understandably set (Pyrczak Bruce , 2005 . The approach of the author was to build her own arguments and thesis from the expatiate of the articles that she had researched . She did take h octogenarian arguably sound observations basically culled from the principles of developmental psychology and the cognitive stages . However , or else of providing evidence in her interventions , she used material after material from secondary and scratch sources and weaving them to imparther to create her own preachingThe article is change with examples and instances that was derived from a number of researches that she had used to make her report , in that compliance was no immature information to nurture or engagement down the points that she was trying to dissect . She relied heavily on old reports and textbooks which in a very fluid and changing humankind of media and social awareness seems to be old news . What was harmful was her use of footnotes she only made mention of the author or the advocate of the theory or the author of the research and when suppose , and it appeared as if it was her own words . There is nada vituperate with employ secondary data , however it should not be used to fit in with the argument but only to put up support or reserve an debate point of view . Secondary data should also be used meagerly , only when necessary or when the original data or research is not available (Orcher , 2005 . In sum , the report lacks the kind of credibility that is necessary for a report of this order . To the non-initiated readers , the report may appear as truth and all-encompassing , but when one reads it in its entirety , the report is roaring , it has not much substance as there is nothing in the report to validate her arguments . She made mention of how goggle box rage affects children negatively but in her cultures she says that research have not confirmed wheth er television violence do aim aggressive behavior in! children . The information she presented are not convincing enough as she speaks in general foothold , for example she says that preschool children have conflicting views on palpableity and a study reported that a child says that cartoons are real because they have refrigerators .

She could have provided more semiempirical studies to support the discussion of the concept of reality in unexampled children instead of assuming that every reader understands the cognitive processes in young children (Babbie , 2004The report by Josephson (1995 ) is actually not a report but a term (Leedy Ormrod , 2005 she was not reporting on anything new or significant , she was presenting a summary of sundry(a) articles link up to the of television violence and children . The discussion on how infants are not actually processing information in television because they have a limited attention duo is obvious and if not is an information that can be called universal sense , since everybody receive that infants because of their immature cognitive abilities cannot quite encompass the concept of a television show . She did include a section on criticisms about the research on television violence and incursion and have even mentioned that studies relevant to the call into question of the effects of TV violence to children was the only materials considered in her report , then go on to say that there is test copy that TV violence causes increased aggression and that scholars who are not convinced are in a minority . In an analysis of this mastery , it is natural that of the studies used in this report , few authors assemble no evi dence to support the cultivation , because she had a! lready been dark-skinned with the kind of studies she chose to use . She also substantiated this conclusion with the several domain positions of several interest groups and organizations which is in opt of TV observe , parental guidance and censorship , which one could say are positive because it is a reality that television shows are important and parents should be aware of the need to monitor and guide their children on what shows to watch . Thus the report is flawed because it does not extend objective data from sound research , it relied heavily on secondary data and it did not provide an unbiased discussion of theReferencesBabbie , E (2004 . The Practice of kindly seek 10th ed . Belmont CA : WadsworthLeedy ,Ormrod , J (2005 . Practical search : Planning and anatomy 8th edUpper Saddle River , NJ : Pearson Prentice-HallOrcher , L (2005 . Conducting research : Social and behavioral science methods . GlendaleCA : Pyrczak producePyrczak , F Bruce , R (2005 . Writing emp irical research reports 3rd ed . Glendale , CAPyrczak Publishing ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay